Did you create the load balancing pools as described here -->
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing , also if
manually edit rules, it might break the webGUI.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Winelfred G. Pasamba <
[email protected]> wrote:

> thanks.  i think i had some of this kind of weirdness too in pfsense
> using pf.conf manually
> to load balance without failover -- i couldn't get to the internet on
> the loadbalancing machine
> although the loadbalancing was working from the internal network.
>
> looks like ip is loadbalanced but tcp is the problem.
>
> http://www.tipsternet.com/articles/advance%20routing.htm looks helpful
> it says "Tip: Keep your router as a router. Don't start sticking
> applications and services on it. Locally generated packets may seem to
> work the same but they are exempt from certain routing logic and
> manipulations."
>
> looks like better run squid in another box
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Alec Joseph Rivera<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Winelfred G. Pasamba wrote:
> >> i'm been trying this "ip route add ... equalize..." thing. sometimes
> >> it works, sometimes it doesn't.
> >>
> > The thing with this is if you're testing from a single station you won't
> > see much. But if you have many stations, looking at the outbound routes
> > will show you that it works. It doesn't make sense for the router to
> > keep on switching gateways, even if say gateway A is unresponsive for a
> > while (not that long). It's the way IP works, it allows for delay. Try
> > to get around this mechanism is usually not a good idea. Normal users
> > won't notice a lot of disruption on the traffic anyway if setup
> correctly.
> >> however failover is automatic and looks like it works. i can unplug
> >> any of the routers and after some time all the pings to different
> >> hosts work again. (dead route detection)
> >>
> >> i also see pings to google going out of routerA and pings to facebook
> >> going out of routerB, which means routes are distributed.
> >>
> >> despite of successful pings i can't telnet to port 80 of google or
> >> facebook, and i wonder why?
> >>
> >>
> > TCP Sessions are the key here and complicates the setup a bit. This is
> > related to what the target sees on the source ip of the packets. You
> > should look at netfilter's conntrack and packet mangling capability.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Alec Joseph Rivera<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Try looking for LARTC on googs. It's got a lot of examples to help you
> >>> achieve what you want.
> >>>
> >>> Agi
> >>>
> >>> Nelson Serafica wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I have 2 isp provider (ISPA and ISPB) and I have 1 machine. The 2 isp
> >>>> provide a modem/router and both of them hook up on the same switch. I
> >>>> called it "PUBLIC SWITCH". My web server was connected also on the
> >>>> PUBLIC SWITCH and use ISPA provided ip address and its gateway.
> >>>>
> >>>> What I want to do is also use ISPB on the same server. I have only 2
> NIC
> >>>> (1 on PUBLIC SWITCH and 1 on my private network) on my webserver. But
> >>>> since it was connected on the PUBLIC SWITCH, I can use ISPB.
> >>>>
> >>>> I put ip address provided by ISPB as virtual (ifcfg-eth0:1) and the
> >>>> metric gateway was 1. But I think this won't work as expected.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a way wherein I can use both ISP and their provided ip block
> on
> >>>> my web server (just like a router)? My client is on a tight budget and
> >>>> don't want to purchase another machine just for a load balancer. But
> >>>> purchasing another NIC card is ok.
> >>>>
> >>>> The OS is CentOS 5.3 with kernel 2.6.18-128.el5. Upon Googling, there
> is
> >>>> a patch on the kernel on how to do this but it seems old. Just asking
> a
> >>>> recommendation on the list who is expert to this.
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>



-- 
http://jangestre.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to