Thanks.  We shall expect you.

//PManalastas


--- On Fri, 7/17/09, Jaime Tiongson <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Jaime Tiongson <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [plug] Code Review & SysAdmin of Election 2010 Computers
> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List" 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 9:08 AM
> I will attend too. Thanks.
> 
> On 7/17/09, Brian Tan Seng <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Doc, I'm volunteering with a non-partisan poll
> watchers
> > group, namely PPCRV.
> >
> > To answer number 4 below, it would be nice to secure
> softcopies of the ER
> > and their sign values. If the assumption holds that
> minimal cheating will
> > happen with the PCOS machines, then we would like to
> get electronic copies
> > of the election results from the precinct level/PCOS
> machines.
> >
> > --
> > Brian Tan Seng
> > Yahoo! Messenger ID: btanseng
> > Registered Linux User # 361862
> > http://counter.li.org
> >
> >
> >> <>
> >>
> >> MY REACTIONS:
> >>
> >>
> >> "After the customization of poll automation
> software" -- means the
> >> software
> >> already exists, so why wait to finish customizing
> it (setting parameters)
> >> before getting the thing reviewed?  The
> source code already exists, and
> >> will
> >> not be affected by customization, so why not
> review the code now?
> >>
> >> If they are going to add new code, then that's a
> different story
> >> altogether. I'd like the following added to the
> code:
> >>
> >> 1) During initialization (hour zero on election
> day), i'd like both PCOS
> >> and CCS computers to print out filenames of all
> executables in /bin,
> >> /sbin,
> >> /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin,
> /usr/local/sbin, together with their
> >> SHA-256 checksums.  Also all configuration
> files in /etc and their SHA-256
> >> checksums.  These are needed to compare with
> the originals that have been
> >> approved by source code review. In particular,
> /etc/securetty must specify
> >> that the root user must never be allowed to log in
> from remote. To make
> >> checking simple for the BEI on election day, this
> printout must be in
> >> lexicographic order of filenames, and must be
> digitally clear-signed by
> >> Smartmatic so that the BEI need only compare the
> signature part (two lines
> >> of text)
> >>
> >> 2) The option to SSL-sign or GPG-sign should be
> put in the code, so that
> >> the teachers have a choice of getting their public
> keys signed by a CA or
> >> signed by a peer.
> >> The signing part should be during the end of the
> voting period, not at the
> >> beginning when there is nothing to sign yet (this
> is the way the current
> >> version of the program looks to me).
> >>
> >> 3) Support for Java smartcards (with CPU) in the
> PCOS and CCS hardware
> >> (smartcard slot) and new program for signing, so
> that using Java
> >> smartcards
> >> for signing, the teachers' secret keys never leave
> the card, and is never
> >> copied over to the computer.
> >>
> >> 4)  Others?
> >>
> >> //PManalastas
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________
> >> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> >> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> >> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
> >>
> >
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> 
> Jaime F. Tiongson
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to