Oscar Plameras wrote: > I'm talking in the context of checking the Automated Election System, as to, > > Please don't be so literal. The guy was providing you an analogy. > 1. Whether every single valid vote was counted as valid and not > counted as invalid > 2. Whether every single invalid vote was counted as invalid and not > counted as valid > 3. And that everyone of the valid votes are included in the > Tabulations of Election Candidates. > > I'm not referring to anything else. > > You are referring to a simple ballot counting made in Disneyland which may only be a part of a system whereas the rest have been talking about a "whole" AES :-) Good morning! Mag-almusal na muna mga 'dre. > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Gideon N. Guillen > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/13/2009 09:09:03 Oscar Plameras wrote: >> >>> The check I propose is by Outcome. >>> >>> If my check will not catch the absurdity in any coding, that's well and >>> good. >>> >> So, are you suggesting that it is OK for a web server as long as it serves >> web pages but have buffer overrun vulnerabilities that would allow a >> malicious individual to take over a machine to do illegal activities? >> _________________________________________________ >> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List >> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug >> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >> >> > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
