Maybe you could try double checking if the md0 device is actually an
LVM volume with pvscan / vgscan. The vgscan manual page reports you
might need to run it explicitly after changing hardware, I've never
had to, but try running `vgscan --mknodes`?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Mike A. <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe it's not detected.. running lvscan gives me this:
>
>  ACTIVE            '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00' [27.44 GB] inherit
>  ACTIVE            '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01' [3.94 GB] inherit
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Mark David Dumlao <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Try an `lvscan` to see if your logical volume is detected. Then mount
>> the appropriate /dev/mapper/... device instead of the bare /dev/md0.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Mike A. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I believed it's in LVM
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mark David Dumlao <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> You moved it from an old server to a new one. By any chance, did you
>>>> use xfs, jfs, or some nonstandard filesystem on your old server?
>>>> Perhaps you don't have the appropriate xfs/jfs tools installed on your
>>>> new one just yet. Or perhaps you used LVM before?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Mike A. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I installed a new CentOS server and added 4 hard disk which is
>>>>> configured as RAID0. These hard disk came from an old server and just
>>>>> wanted to restore the data that's store in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> In DMESG, it says that the RAID was detected and it was configured. (see 
>>>>> below)
>>>>>
>>>>> md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>>>>> md: autorun ...
>>>>> md: considering sdd1 ...
>>>>> md:  adding sdd1 ...
>>>>> md:  adding sdc1 ...
>>>>> md:  adding sdb1 ...
>>>>> md:  adding sda1 ...
>>>>> md: created md0
>>>>> md: bind<sda1>
>>>>> md: bind<sdb1>
>>>>> md: bind<sdc1>
>>>>> md: bind<sdd1>
>>>>> md: running: <sdd1><sdc1><sdb1><sda1>
>>>>> md: raid0 personality registered for level 0
>>>>> md0: setting max_sectors to 512, segment boundary to 131071
>>>>> raid0: looking at sdd1
>>>>> raid0:   comparing sdd1(976759808) with sdd1(976759808)
>>>>> raid0:   END
>>>>> raid0:   ==> UNIQUE
>>>>> raid0: 1 zones
>>>>> raid0: looking at sdc1
>>>>> raid0:   comparing sdc1(976759808) with sdd1(976759808)
>>>>> raid0:   EQUAL
>>>>> raid0: looking at sdb1
>>>>> raid0:   comparing sdb1(976759808) with sdd1(976759808)
>>>>> raid0:   EQUAL
>>>>> raid0: looking at sda1
>>>>> raid0:   comparing sda1(976759808) with sdd1(976759808)
>>>>> raid0:   EQUAL
>>>>> raid0: FINAL 1 zones
>>>>> raid0: done.
>>>>> raid0 : md_size is 3907039232 blocks.
>>>>> raid0 : conf->hash_spacing is 3907039232 blocks.
>>>>> raid0 : nb_zone is 1.
>>>>> raid0 : Allocating 4 bytes for hash.
>>>>> md: ... autorun DONE.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, whenever I mount /dev/md0 to a folder, it gives me this error:
>>>>>
>>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0,
>>>>>       missing codepage or other error
>>>>>       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>>>>>       dmesg | tail  or so
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think is the problem? How can I mount /dev/md0 so I can
>>>>> restore it's data?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [ ] social
>>>> Response needed:  [ ] yes          [ ] up to you  [ ] no
>>>> Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [ ] none
>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [ ] social
>> Response needed:  [ ] yes          [ ] up to you  [ ] no
>> Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [ ] none
>> _________________________________________________
>> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
>> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>>
> _________________________________________________
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>



-- 
This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [ ] social
Response needed:  [ ] yes          [ ] up to you  [ ] no
Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [ ] none
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to