On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P > > LOL easier said than done. Compliance is a very powerful business motivator.
Pretty easy when you can demonstrate other business motivators can override it (e.g. manglement wants it now na, no questions!, or you have incompetent IT equivalents on the other side "complying" to an objectively stupid standard, etc, etc.) Compliance is only good in stuff where you don't have anything better; in OP's case though, there ought to be some stuff other than ClamAV (not surprisingly, on the proprietary side,) that can appease the auditors. Since money will be always in play in this discussion, the question becomes one of minimizing cost to maximize compliance, in a given urgency. -- Zak B. Elep || zakame.net 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
