On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Rogan Creswick wrote: > That looks like it's finding the wrong libxul.so.
Rogan, [r...@salmo ~]# find / -name libxul.so /usr/lib/tls/libxul.so /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.10/libxul.so and, lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 2010-10-20 11:25 /usr/lib/tls/libxul.so -> /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.10/libxul.so* So, it's the only one on the system. > ... look around at the libxul so's that came with firefox and see if they > define that symbol (you can get the list of symbols from a shared lib. > with 'nm'). My guess is that the libxul in /usr/lib/tls is not the version > you need for firefox, but it's showning up in the LD search path first. That's because I saw in the strace output /usr/lib/tls is where firefox was looking for it so I put it there. Now, when I run ldd, there are _no_ missing libraries. But, an unfound symbol. Sigh. Another dead end: [r...@salmo /usr/src]# nm /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.10/libxul.so nm: /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.10/libxul.so: no symbols > Did the LD_LIBRARY_PATH trick help at all? Nope. This is quite frustrating. Thanks, Rich _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
