On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Bill Barry wrote: > I should add that this seems to say that memtest86 crashed not that it > reported you have bad memory.
Bill, Certainly looks that way. I replaced memtest86 with memtest86+. It ran all night (was in the 13th pass when I stopped it). In the first pass 8 errors were detected; no additional ones found. What is considered an acceptable error number? The 8 found here seems high to me, but I know the areas are very tightly packed on the silicon. Should I swap these for a new pair? Thanks, Rich _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
