>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Dexter <[email protected]> writes:

Michael> Part 1: Theory & management & ISP routing, as well as current events in
Michael> the IPv6 realm. For example, did you know that Nortel just sold
Michael> Microsoft a huge chunk of IPv4 legacy addresses for something like 7
Michael> million dollars? This has really turned the tables on the game.

I totally disagree.  This was a liquidation at a bankruptcy court, and
Microsoft likely bought it only because they could.

It's very difficult to transfer IPv4 space... the massive routing tables
won't allow a lot more partial transfers.  So if anything, the RIRs will
step in soon and say "transfers not allowed", just to preserve the
routing table size.

I suppose you could *tunnel* a partial space, but that'd be like getting
hand-me-downs... IPv4 traffic that has to be tunneled to get to where it
really needs to go.

If you need a better explanation, consider this.

Suppose I own 4.x.x.x right now (that's 4.0.0.0/8), and I'm really only
using half.  So I decide to sell you 4.N.x.x where N > 127.  Now, if
you're not immediately adjacent to me on the internets (and it's not
possible to be adjacent on multiple vectors, so the answer is *never*),
every single ASN router will have to record *two* routes where they
formerly had one: one toward me for 4.0.0.0/9, and one towards you at
4.128.0.0/9.

If people are allowed to do that, the routers would quickly collapse.
The RIRs won't allow that.

Thus, there's not going to be an IPv4 gold rush, and instead IPv6 *must*
be deployed before the first RIRs are dry.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion

_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to