LTSpice from Linear Technology is not free-free, but it's
free-as-in-beer and it's tuned to run under Wine (it actually detects
that it's running under Wine and changes its behavior).  It has been
100% trouble-free for me.  I prefer it because their algorithms have
been completely re-written to optimize for switching supplies, and as a
consequence they model RF oscillator start-up much better than other
SPICE programs I've used.  The only real drawback is that (for some
reason!!!) they only include models of Linear Technology ICs, and they
don't stay current with all the latest MOSFETs.

But it's easy enough to put in someone else's model, if you can get it.

Ditto EagleCAD.  Also not free-free, but they have a native Linux
version, and their free-as-in-beer version is only crippled to the
extent that the circuit board is limited in size and to two layers, and
doesn't come with an auto-router.  Their $$ version is quite nice to
use, even if it happens to be at the bottom of the ladder as far as pro
EDA software goes.

I've been using both of these products professionally for years, and
they've served me quite well.

On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 21:35 -0800, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> I am trying to do some (rather simple) spice simulations.
> 
> I have all the gEDA packages (ubuntu).  gschem (schematic capture) seems to
> work, but blurts out many error messages.  I have not yet tried to do the
> net list (gnetlist) because of those error messages, and I am not sure
> which of the myriad of netlist standards I should use.  Anybody here have
> some experience with these tools?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Denis
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

-- 

Tim Wescott
www.wescottdesign.com
Control & Communications systems, circuit & software design.

_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to