On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Daniel Herrington wrote: > This just came across from our Sys Admin team: > * > "They may be able to increase it [user processes] a little, but probably > not enough to resolve the problem, which was the case last time we saw this > issue. Linux [user processes] cannot be set to unlimited like other unix > flavors."* > > I find this hard to believe. However, the more I think about it maybe it's > true since you need to put a # in /etc/security/limits.conf?
Daniel, For those of us not in the profession please explain the context of this issue. Does it refer to the number of processes owned by each user, the resources used by all processes owned by a user, or something else? Just curious, Rich _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
