Oh perhaps it was somewhat climate and housing related then.  I suppose it
depends on your use case.  If you don't cause any load on them I am sure
they are fine.

Which OS would that be?  There are many things that are great about Linux
but I find your use of the term "modern" somewhat confusing.  Whether you
are talking about the kernel or the user land would we really say that
Linux is modern?  Free, powerful, familiar, robust, ?  I mean of the
packaged router in a box systems I think it is really hard to beat pfsense.
 And I have used most of them.  That said if you are gonna do it all from
the command line it probably doesn't matter which one you use if it has
crypto library support for the onboard chipset.

The hope with these boards was that they had the cpu to do the vpn and
routing we needed at the time.  If properly tuned they would just get by.
 But given the hot climate they were installed in perhaps the case and
complete packaging where at fault there.

I mean they are sort of between a full PC router and a linksys class
OpenWRT box.  There was basically one OpenVPN setting that would work with
the on board accelerator.  The rest would work but could only push like
50-80Kbits between the links.  No crypto was 2Mbit as was the one
compatible library setting.
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to