hmmm I'm pretty sure I meant facto. "PDF" is the de jure standard, Acrobat's special variety is the de facto standard.
de jure means "by the rules" while de facto means "in fact" (implying "despite the rules, this is the reality of the situation") thankfully, this is changing, albeit slowly. -wes On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Rigel Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > s/facto/jure/ > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:48 PM, wes <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Rigel Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> "...they are designed specifically to be displayed by other adobe > >> products..." > >> > >> There are so many PDF creators, some of which follow the ISO > >> specifications ( > >> > http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=51502 > >> and related), some of which dont very well, that i don't think that > >> this statement makes much sense. > >> > >> > > creators as in software applications which can be used to create PDFs? > sure. > > > > creators as in people who create PDFs? most of them use adobe products to > > create them. most of those who don't, use products tailored to create > PDFs > > for viewing by acrobat reader. > > > > that said, even if it is still more than half, this number is dwindling > > steadily as other large organizations take on adobe's de facto standard. > > apple and google have written PDF viewers that are not entirely lame. > > > > -wes > > _______________________________________________ > > PLUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
