On 06/29/2017 02:24 PM, VY wrote: >> Do you recall the sample bit depth and rate - [so I could compare to >> hardware I'll be looking at]. > > This has been more than a decade so my recollection may be off. > > I was not doing anything that require very clear perception. It > was a home toy project albeit with practice home-automation use. > I think it was something like 12bit or 24bit. Somehow, that number > comes to my mind when I saw your question. > But again, I could be off > > -v
If the information was available it would have been a useful data point. Thank you. > > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Richard Owlett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 06/29/2017 11:17 AM, VY wrote: >>> About 11 years ago, I had a PC and using older version of this software: >>> >>> https://cmusphinx.github.io/ >> >> That page speaks of Pocketsphinx, an apparently current version is in >> the Debian repository. Synaptic reports "This package contains end-user >> speech recognition tools", so it should be good start. >> >> The site has valuable background information. >> >>> >>> I had to write some scripts but I have had some good success. I did >>> have a hardware audio/video capture card but not sure if that is >>> making any difference or not. >> >> Do you recall the sample bit depth and rate - [so I could compare to >> hardware I'll be looking at]. >> >>> I would think it is much better by now. I no longer have such a >>> system in place. >> >> Thank you. _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
