At 04:08 PM 3/14/01 +0800, Miguel A.L. Paraz wrote:
Well, since ph-isp is more focused on isp as a whole... we can
have ph-networkers focusing on purely networking (switching, routing,
etc.). {=)
>I already proposed ph-networkers to replace ph-isp, but some people had
>objections... can't remember what.
---
Reynald I. Ngo
Express Internet, Inc.
Express Telecoms Co., Inc.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [plug] IRC port 6667 Unix SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
- Re: [plug] IRC port 6667 Clemen Canaria (PH IM)
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 Unix SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
- Re: [plug] IRC port 6667 Reynald I. Ngo
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 Unix SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 Reynald I. Ngo
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 Reynald I. Ngo
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 neuroticimbecile
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 Unix SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
- [plug] ph-networkers? Miguel A.L. Paraz
- [plug] Mailing List Reynald I. Ngo
- [plug] Mailing List Jackson Ching
- Re: [plug] Mailing List sevillar
- Re: [plug] Mailing List neuroticimbecile
- Re: [plug] Mailing List Reynald I. Ngo
- Re: [plug] Mailing List Miguel A.L. Paraz
- Re: [plug] Mailing List Reynald I. Ngo
- Re: [plug] Mailing List Joseph Ross Lee
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 San Goku
- Re: [plug] IRC port 6667 Froilan Mendoza
- RE: [plug] IRC port 6667 San Goku
