On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, likot wrote:
> hrmm if i understand it right the appeals court said
> that they are sending it back to lower court BUT with
> a diff. judge ( they said jackson was kinda "bias"
> well not the right word but i think thats what they
> meant )
They are sending it back for judgement. The findings of fact remain
correct and are affirmed by the appeals court. Conclusions of the new
judge should be based on those findings of fact as far as I can tell.
___ eric pareja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - "We're all crazy. No one wants to admit it."
\@/ http://gra.ph/~xenos/xenos.pgp | http://plug.linux.org.ph [O/////O]------+
v "Even the smallest person can change the course of the future." / Clue |
- Lady Galadriel in J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" +-------+
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
