are there any advantages if .net were ported to linux? i mean, would that be considered 'innovation'? there's already java on linux, why would we need yet another distributed component architecture wachamacallit on linux, much less a mere translation of microsoft technology into linux? is it my imagination or is this .net linux port like a 'hey, me too!' playing catch-up kind of thing?
flames > /dev/null joel :) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerome Tan > Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 11:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] OT:.NET of Open Source > > > > > Websphere is IBM's Java application server. I dont think its ope-source > > though, can someone correct me on this, because its the most > expensive on > > this type. Its java thats what .Net is up against to. > > > Yeah... Java platform not the Java language is what .NET is > competing with. > > Then C# for Java? > > Regards/ > Jerome > > _ > Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
