Hello again! Thanks for the quick reply guys!!! but my ftpaccess file is in /etc and that is where in.ftpd is pointing and the user's shell is definitely in the etc/shells. I never experienced this before in using the lower versions especially in 6.2. I'll probably check out Pro Ftp. SCP is a good idea though...good encryption and security....Any other ideas guys?
Superman/Krypton: Are you Apol? ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:40:10 +0800 (PHT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: plug digest, Vol 1 #1386 - 16 msgs > Send plug mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of plug digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. error on my server (oninz) > 2. off topic : testing (jones ong) > 3. FTP Login error (Eliel Antero S. Roxas) > 4. Re: FTP Login error ([K][R][Y][P][T][O][N]) > 5. Re: FTP Login error (vince cagud) > 6. Re: Only first 8 characters of password are significant (Resolved!) (Federico >Sevilla III) > 7. Re: FTP Login error (Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla) > 8. security (thea galano) > 9. Lycoris Desktop/LX (was: Mandrake-Linux 8.2 Available) (Federico Sevilla III) > 10. Re: security (Federico Sevilla III) > 11. Linux Scheduler Latency (Federico Sevilla III) > 12. Re: Linux Scheduler Latency (Gino LV. Ledesma) > 13. Re: Linux Scheduler Latency (Juan Miguel Cacho) > 14. [OT] Your Thoughts on OpenBSD (Joon Guillen) > 15. MB News - PAL dumps Microsoft in favor of StarOfficeAirline saves > US$300,000 in cost avoidance (Jeffrey Wong) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:13:50 -0800 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: oninz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [plug] error on my server > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Fellow Pluggers, > > I just want to ask if anyone can explained this problem i > encountered on my server, I dont if its hardware failure or its system bugs > or misconfiguration, This is what i mean. > > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: Transmit list 00000000 vs. c6eb3400. > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 0: @c6eb3200 length 8000004c status 0001004c > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 1: @c6eb3240 length 80000067 status 00010067 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 2: @c6eb3280 length 8000005a status 0001005a > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 3: @c6eb32c0 length 80000067 status 00010067 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 4: @c6eb3300 length 8000005c status 0001005c > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 5: @c6eb3340 length 800000ab status 000100ab > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 6: @c6eb3380 length 800000ab status 000100ab > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 7: @c6eb33c0 length 800000ab status 800100ab > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 8: @c6eb3400 length 80000060 status 00010060 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 9: @c6eb3440 length 80000125 status 00010125 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 10: @c6eb3480 length 80000125 status 00010125 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 11: @c6eb34c0 length 8000005c status 0001005c > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 12: @c6eb3500 length 80000067 status 00010067 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 13: @c6eb3540 length 80000067 status 00010067 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 14: @c6eb3580 length 80000067 status 00010067 > Mar 17 14:05:49 dvo kernel: 15: @c6eb35c0 length 8000004c status 000 > I have also encountered that every time my computers going to reboot, its > always stack and hung on at message "RESTARTING YOUR SYSTEM".... Sir Jijo > gave some explanation of it when i plug this last year regarding this > problem and im planning to reinstall my server after changing my ISP but i > have to ask some explanation of, if hardware failure or system error, I > appreciate all the comments you can shared.... TY > > > oninz > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 23:13:11 -0800 (PST) > From: jones ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [plug] off topic : testing > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > testing > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� > http://movies.yahoo.com/ > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: "Eliel Antero S. Roxas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:17:35 +0800 > Subject: [plug] FTP Login error > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello Evryone! > > I am trying to set up an FTP server in Red Hat 7.1. The FTP service is running but >everytime I log on to the ftp server it prompts this error "530 Login incorrect Login >Failed" though the login name is not in the ftpusers file and is configured correctly >in the ftpaccess file. A sample of these two files would be very much appreciated. >Thank you and more power!!! > > > -- > > Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org > > > Powered by Outblaze > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > From: "[K][R][Y][P][T][O][N]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [plug] FTP Login error > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:35:55 +0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi there Eliel! > > Try to check the location of the ftpaccess file and the location where the > ftpd is actually looking. > Maybe they are not in the same directory. > > HTH > SUPERMAN > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eliel Antero S. Roxas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:17 PM > Subject: [plug] FTP Login error > > > > Hello Evryone! > > > > I am trying to set up an FTP server in Red Hat 7.1. The FTP service is > running but everytime I log on to the ftp server it prompts this error "530 > Login incorrect Login Failed" though the login name is not in the ftpusers > file and is configured correctly in the ftpaccess file. A sample of these > two files would be very much appreciated. Thank you and more power!!! > > > > > > -- > > > > Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org > > > > > > Powered by Outblaze > > _ > > Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at > http://plug.linux.org.ph > > To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:00:26 +0800 > From: vince cagud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] FTP Login error > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > one other thing...make sure the user's shell is in /etc/shells. learned > this the hard way in the old days. =) > > --v > > Eliel Antero S. Roxas wrote: > > >Hello Evryone! > > > >I am trying to set up an FTP server in Red Hat 7.1. The FTP service is running but >everytime I log on to the ftp server it prompts this error "530 Login incorrect Login >Failed" though the login name is not in the ftpusers file and is configured correctly >in the ftpaccess file. A sample of these two files would be very much appreciated. >Thank you and more power!!! > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:12:08 +0800 (PHT) > From: Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Justin Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Philippine Linux Users' Group Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [plug] Re: Only first 8 characters of password are significant (Resolved!) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Justin, > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 at 11:43, Justin Hahn wrote: > > > pam_password crypt > > > > This is the cause right there. UNIX crypt only allows 8 character passwords > > > > > crypt md5 > > > > AFAIAW, this has no effect. > > I was under the impression that this combination would work. Obviously I > read wrong. Thank you very much for pointing it out. > > > I think it's an obsoleted config variable. If you want long passwords you > > need to use MD5 passwords or kerberos. I'd recommend doing this in your > > ldap.conf > > > > pam_password exop > > > > NOTE: This only works with OpenLDAP. This will give you what you're looking > > for. You'll need to change your password for it to take effect. > > This WORKS!!! :) :) :) > > Thank you very much. What's better, this is "backward compatible" in that > the old crypted passwords work fine, as well. Plus newly changed passwords > are significant to... well I haven't tested but definitely more than 8 > characters. :) > > Thank you very one. > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key: http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:13:33 +0800 > From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] FTP Login error > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 03:17:35PM +0800, Eliel Antero S. Roxas wrote: > > Hello Evryone! > > > > I am trying to set up an FTP server in Red Hat 7.1. > > Forget about installing it. I'm serious. > > I would strongly suggest that you ditch the FTP server completely, or > leave it at anonymous-only download if that's what you want. > Non-anonymous FTP is very dangerous in today's world, as it performs > authentication without cryptography, which is a complete joke. As I > have said over and over, FTP is a relic of a time when the Internet was > a research network where everyone could trust everyone else. This goes > as much for a private network as it does for the Internet, as insecure > habits in one environment can carry over to others without your noticing > it at once. > > Instead, I suggest you set up SSH and use SCP and SFTP. You'll at least > have some solid cryptography to cover your ass while you perform > authentication. > > -- > Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph> +63(2)8183151 > Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc. +63(917)4458925 > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > From: "thea galano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:53:07 -0800 > Subject: [plug] security > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C1D1C2.0A6F9530 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > hi people Is theres a way that I can hide the open ports of our servers = > when someone view it using nmap? > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 > > ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C1D1C2.0A6F9530 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> > <STYLE></STYLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>hi people Is theres a way that I can hide the = > open ports=20 > of our servers when someone�view it using nmap?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV>�</DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR>---<BR>Outgoing mail is certified Virus=20 > Free.<BR>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A=20 > href=3D"http://www.grisoft.com";>http://www.grisoft.com</A>).<BR>Version: = > 6.0.338 /=20 > Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > > ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C1D1C2.0A6F9530-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:59:01 +0800 (PHT) > From: Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [plug] Lycoris Desktop/LX (was: Mandrake-Linux 8.2 Available) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 at 23:27, Victor Serafica wrote: > > No Lycoris Desktop L/X? I wanna test it. > > The Leather Collection iTeam accepts orders for copies of, among others, > Lycoris Desktop/LX build 44. Note that Lycoris is the new name of what was > previously RedmondLinux. For more details please feel free to check out > <http://iteam.leathercollection.ph/>. > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key: http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:13:45 +0800 (PHT) > From: Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [plug] security > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 at 16:53, thea galano wrote: > > hi people Is theres a way that I can hide the open ports of our servers > > when someone view it using nmap? > > If you don't need the ports to be open to everybody on the Internet, > selectively allow (or selectively disallow) access to these ports using > ipchains/iptables. If you need the ports to be open to everybody (eg: SMTP > for a mail gateway, HTTP/HTTPS for your webserver), then don't be afraid > if people find out these are accessible when they do portscans of your > box. Because people should know those, anyway, right? Work instead to > secure the daemon listening on that port. > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key: http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:35:56 +0800 (PHT) > From: Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Philippine Linux Users' Group Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [plug] Linux Scheduler Latency > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Fellow PLUGgers, > > Clark Williams of RedHat did some studies on the low-latency patches and > the preemption patches, to see which of the two did most to help with the > kernel's scheduler latency. And the result? (drumroll) Both. :) > > <http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8906594941.html> > > It's also has a pretty neat overview about what latency is, and why > there's all this fuss about tweaking this bit of the kernel. :) > > I think both Ingo's O(1) and RML's Preemption patch are in kernel 2.5. I'm > not sure, though. Anyway, let's see what the next "stable" tree will get > us. I hope we won't have to keep our breaths held for too long. ;> > > --> Jijo > > -- > Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. > GnuPG Key: http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:27:04 +0800 > From: "Gino LV. Ledesma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] Linux Scheduler Latency > Organization: Ateneo Cervini-Eliazo Networks > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > > Fellow PLUGgers, > > > > Clark Williams of RedHat did some studies on the low-latency patches and > > the preemption patches, to see which of the two did most to help with the > > kernel's scheduler latency. And the result? (drumroll) Both. :) > > > > <http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8906594941.html> > > > > It's also has a pretty neat overview about what latency is, and why > > there's all this fuss about tweaking this bit of the kernel. :) > > Its a rather interesting read, especially for those interested in > Operating Systems and scheduling design. > > > > I think both Ingo's O(1) and RML's Preemption patch are in kernel 2.5. I'm > > not sure, though. Anyway, let's see what the next "stable" tree will get > > us. I hope we won't have to keep our breaths held for too long. ;> > > I compiled a 2.5.6 kernel with the preempt patch a few weeks ago. Though > I've not done any official benchmarking whatsoever, I do have this > impression that the system feels generally snappier, especially with > X+KDE loaded. > > I'll try giving Ingo's low latency patch in time, since I'm still wary > about its stability/performance in the long run (the article mentions > degraded scheduler performance after 12 hours). > > Also interesting is combining both patches to get an overall better > scheduler. However, since there is continued development at the 2.5.x > tree, I'll be patient and see if they can finish doing that for us > instead. :) > > -------------------------------------- > Gino LV. Ledesma > Ateneo Cervini-Eliazo Networks (ACENT) > email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web : http://cersa.admu.edu.ph/ > phone : (63)(2) 426-6001 ext. 5925 > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:54:22 +0800 > From: Juan Miguel Cacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [plug] Linux Scheduler Latency > Organization: Bombastar-myDSL > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > En Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III escribio: > #_ Fellow PLUGgers, > #_ > #_ Clark Williams of RedHat did some studies on the low-latency patches > #_ and the preemption patches, to see which of the two did most to help > #_ with the kernel's scheduler latency. And the result? (drumroll) Both. > #_ :) > #_ > #_ <http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8906594941.html> > #_ > #_ It's also has a pretty neat overview about what latency is, and why > #_ there's all this fuss about tweaking this bit of the kernel. :) > #_ > #_ I think both Ingo's O(1) and RML's Preemption patch are in kernel > #_ 2.5. I'm not sure, though. Anyway, let's see what the next "stable" > #_ tree will get us. I hope we won't have to keep our breaths held for > #_ too long. ;> > #_ > #_ --> Jijo > > I wonder if both are included in Linux Kernel Patches Collection > 2.4.18-4, I know the preemptive patch is included, but I'm not sure > about the low latency patch. For those interested, checkit out: > > http://freshmeat.net/projects/lkpc/ > or > http://lkpc.sourceforge.net/ > > For those interested, you will need a vanilla 2.4.18 kernel, > lkpc-2.4.18-4.patch.bz2 and lkpc-addon-2.4.18-4.patch.bz2. > > -- > Juan Miguel Cacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Para�aque City, Philippines > GnuPG Public Key Key ID 7B071F7F > http://www.philonline.com/~chocovim/pancitmolo.pgp > Drive safely. 90% of people are caused by accidents. > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > From: "Joon Guillen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:04:26 +0800 > Subject: [plug] [OT] Your Thoughts on OpenBSD > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_015A_01C1D1E5.264FE250 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hello, > > I'm about to make a Firewall / NAT machine, and I was thinking of trying = > OpenBSD. But before delving into it, I would like to know your thoughts = > about it, and perhaps compare it also with Linux. Would I be better off = > using Linux for NAT or will OpenBSD provide better packet transfer? = > How's the hardware support on BSD kernels? Things like that, and some = > more if you would care to share it. > > BTW, the OpenBSD version I have right now is 2.9 (still trying to = > download 3.0). > > Thanks a lot! > > Joon > > ------=_NextPart_000_015A_01C1D1E5.264FE250 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = > http-equiv=3DContent-Type> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=3DGENERATOR> > <STYLE></STYLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello,</FONT></DIV> > <DIV>�</DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm about to make a Firewall / NAT = > machine, and I=20 > was thinking of trying OpenBSD.� But before delving into it, I = > would like=20 > to know your thoughts about it, and perhaps compare it also�with=20 > Linux.� Would I be better off using Linux for NAT or will OpenBSD = > provide=20 > better packet transfer?� How's the hardware support on BSD = > kernels?�=20 > Things like that, and some more if you would care to share = > it.</FONT></DIV> > <DIV>�</DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>BTW, the OpenBSD version I have right = > now is 2.9=20 > (still trying to download 3.0).</FONT></DIV> > <DIV>�</DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks a lot!</FONT></DIV> > <DIV>�</DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Joon</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > > ------=_NextPart_000_015A_01C1D1E5.264FE250-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > From: Jeffrey Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:46:46 +0800 > Subject: [plug] MB News - PAL dumps Microsoft in favor of StarOfficeAirline saves > US$300,000 in cost avoidance > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D1B0.6444BC00 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > > PAL dumps Microsoft in favor of StarOffice > Airline saves US$300,000 in cost avoidance > > > > The national flag carrier reported that it has chosen StarOffice5.2 > Productivity Suite as its standard office application, a move that has > saved the debt-ridden company an estimated US$300,000 in cost avoidance. > > > > > FULL STORY >> > <http://www.mb.com.ph/news.php?art=8326�=8&feedback=yes&fname=INFO/2 > 002-03/IT0203218326o.txt> > > _____ > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D1B0.6444BC00 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> > <HTML> > <HEAD> > <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = > 5.5.2653.12"> > <TITLE>MB News - PAL dumps Microsoft in favor of StarOfficeAirline = > saves US$300,000 in cost avoidance </TITLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY> > > <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>PAL dumps Microsoft in favor of StarOffice</FONT> > <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Airline saves US$300,000 in cost avoidance </FONT> > </P> > <BR> > <BR> > > <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The national flag carrier reported that it has chosen = > StarOffice5.2</FONT> > <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Productivity Suite as its standard office = > application, a move that has</FONT> > <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>saved the debt-ridden company an estimated = > US$300,000 in cost avoidance.</FONT> > </P> > <BR> > <BR> > <BR> > > <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>FULL STORY >></FONT> > <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2><<A = > HREF=3D"http://www.mb.com.ph/news.php?art=3D8326�=3D8&feedback=3Dyes= > &fname=3DINFO/2" = > TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.mb.com.ph/news.php?art=3D8326�=3D8&feed= > back=3Dyes&fname=3DINFO/2</A></FONT> > <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>002-03/IT0203218326o.txt> </FONT> > </P> > > <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>� _____� </FONT> > </P> > <BR> > <BR> > <BR> > > </BODY> > </HTML> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D1B0.6444BC00-- > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > plug mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug > > > End of plug Digest > > -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
