While Eweek labs seems to think that RedHat's Tux 2.0 Server is the fastest one around...
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D708%2526a%253D20371,00.asp and I do believe there are some very cool new features in the 2.4 kernel (that are supposed to make Linux more competitive with *BSD as a server), they seem to come at an unacceptable price: http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0114.kernel.html Linuxworld's Joshua Drake makes the 2.4 kernel sound like it is real disaster. I thought changing over the VM system from Rik Van Riel's to Andrea Arcangeli's (should never have been something that happens in a 'stable' release) fixed things. From the article it sounds like from all the fiddling still going on with 2.4.x, it should have been more aptly labeled an odd-numbered release. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
