On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:59:51PM +0800, Fernando wrote: > clamscan I recently installed ClamAV in our mail server, to scan all email beside McAfee uvscan. I know I added overhead, but considering uvscan already did a lousy job of being optimal, I figured the overhead of ClamAV wouldn't hurt me too much (and it didn't). My real purpose in doing this was to be able to evaluate ClamAV in a real world scenario. Every virus alert I get now comes with the results of uvscan and clamscan.
Despite having updated oav datafiles I notice that ClamAV doesn't find some new worms and viruses, like BugBear, for instance, which uvscan finds. I'm very hopeful for both OAV and ClamAV, though. I hope the development communities for both tools can keep up their work, and look forward to the day when both OAV and ClamAV will be true alternatives to commercial anti-virus programs. --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : http://jijo.free.net.ph Network Administrator : The Leather Collection, Inc. GnuPG Key ID : 0x93B746BE _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
