> That's true misconception about ai. Every person in > robotics know how Rodney Brooks of MIT was able make > a walking insect using 8 (or 10) MC68XX > microcontroller in 1989. It is how good your > algorithm that matters.
Even then, walking is completely different from natural language. Robotics has grown in leaps and bounds since 1989, and we see a lot of spinoffs and outgrowths of research in the field. However, AI (especially natural language AI) is pretty darn difficult. Insect walking itself is not AI, AFAIK. > But there is this one interesting research where > instead of using ascii characters to key in our > password, a person picks a sequence of objects > on the screen to authenticate (created by > Passlogix). The claim is this is more secure. I heard of another version, where the user would choose a particular face among a sequence of faces. Similar thought. Would it be feasible to implement on Linux? Something to ponder... ;) ===== the CyberLizard CyberLizard productions Why, did you think I was sane? cyberlizard.digitalrice.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
