> how could apache be more economical than IIS when in 
> fact IIS is already built into Windows NT/2000? this 
> kind of reasoning doesn't make sense (remember Microsoft's 
> previous tagline "making it all make sense"?)

'Coz Apache is 'built into' Linux? And Linux itself is free 
or much cheaper compared to NT/2K...

I myself would advocate a mix of machines for
an enterprise depending on specific needs. There are 
clearly many areas where running Windows is less of 
a headache than Linux (and vice versa).

That said, my goal is to remove the dependence on Windoze 
in our business as much as possible without compromising
anything.

_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph

To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to