Heres more...
-----Original Message-----
Fr
From: Javier, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:33 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [PH-TechHeads] Open Source and Vulnerability


Hi Johnny.

Good timing on this inquiry.  I just had a very animated conversation with
my regional IS director about the future of Linux.  There is a good article
about this in Newsweek, I can share a copy if you like.  Firstly, Open
Source is the IS security auditor's worst nightmare.

Anyway, as much as Open Source is about the potential batlle between Linux
and Microsoft/Sun -- and Linux utilizing the Open Source mantra to the
fullest.  It will all be driven by "economics".  For the Linux purists,
they are embracing the Open Source doctrine and doing it for free.  For the
"blue suit" companies -- Intel, IBM, Dell -- it is their chance to have
more business leverage in dealing with Microsoft/Oracle and thrashing Sun.
For the "silent majority" underground programmers, it is their chance to
conduct some sort of a guerilla warfare against the big three -- Microsoft,
Oracle, and Sun.

I also share your issues/concerns about security and putting some level of
control -- without neglecting the fact that Open Source is "free" and offer
much flexibility.  There will be no silver bullet solution into this .....
it will be a cocktail of solutions to address varying concerns/issues.  I
guess the first question you have to ask is, "What systems are mission
critical to your core business?"  By knowing this, you will be able to plan
your approach and determine if you are willing to embrace Open Source or
apply computing environment standards/controls.  Mission critical systems
must still be secured, controlled, and exclusive.

Personally, Linux/Open Source will give me short-term benefits but I will
not put my future (or the future of the business) into something that is
very vulnerable.  Linux/Open Source will always be the "Wild West" of
business computing and it will stay that way.  That's why, I think
Linux/Open Source will rule the Inernet world but will struggle in
providing core business solutions.

If your core business is about providing services to the rest of the world,
then you have to seriously consider the Linux/Open Source strategy.
However, you still have to consider building a secured and controlled
community.  In the case of AstraZeneca, our future is always about
discovering new drugs and introducing them to the market the shortest
possible time.  Our R&D infrastructure is like Alcatraz located in the
North Pole.  Introducing Open Source to them is like walking to a
competitor and giving them the chemical composition of our key products.

Linux is the latest craze since Netscape and Dot Coms ..... but the two
biggest industry movers -- Microsoft and Intel -- will find a way to deal
with this challenge.

The above is my take on this issue.


Cheers!
Jae



-----Original Message-----
Fr
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PH-TechHeads] Open Source and Vulnerability



I would like to solicit comments and feedback on a hypothesis that I'm
looking into.

Open Source computing increases security vulnerability due to the way the
community actually understands limitations and flaws of the system.  As
such, vulnerability exploits have a greater probability of happening.   At
the same time, due to the "underground" nature of open source
contributions, we are unable to police its ranks -- plenty of opportunities
for lurkers with bad intentions to come in.

This is similar to the current Microsoft situation but in a slightly
different manner.  Microsoft's vulnerability is its popularility.  As such,
there are more people who are trained to actually use and develop products
on their platforms.  Thus, you have an army of hackers and crackers just
waiting on the sidelines to push the envelope.

What's the difference though in protection strategies?  For Open Source, we
are dependent on the Open Source community at large to try and police or
create defensive products to help block off attacks.  Unfortunately, this
is not a concerted effort due to the non-remuneration model of Open Source.

In Microsoft and other branded Unix environments, there is a whole slew of
companies whose primary purpose is to create products to defend against
attacks.

Open Source has become popular due to the "free" nature of the beast.  It
will catch on further as companies begin to understand how to further
exploit it.  But, its popularity will also mean its downfall unless we come
up with adequate means of protecting the platform.

As a CIO, I'm hesitant in plunging head on into a full Linux strategy for
industrial-strength and enterprise-class applications and deployment.  Cost
benefits aside, I'm worried about support issues and vulnerabilities.  Yet,
I cannot ignore what's happening and need to formulate a strategy for
possible Linux acceptance.

Given this scenario, I would appreciate any comments, suggestions and
thoughts on what you feel about the above.  Am I right, did I miss
something or is there a silver bullet out there that can help us make
better decision on this.

Many thanks.

Regards,


Johnny C. Sy
VP - Information Technology
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation/
The Communications Group

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
 <
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=243066.2784921.4151384.1927555/D=egroupweb/S=17059095
61:HM/A=1377502/R=0/*http://www.verisign.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?a=b315501132060
04000>
  <
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=243066.2784921.4151384.1927555/D=egroupmai
l/S=:HM/A=1377502/rand=346737386>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph

To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

Reply via email to