MySQL: A threat to bigwigs?
Open-source database has dazzling opportunities ahead
By David KirkpatrickFORTUNE.COM
Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Posted: 4:13 PM EST (2113 GMT
...."Even when we give it away free we always get a benefit out of it.
We have the world's largest quality assurance facility." ...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/03/12/fortune.ff.open.source/index.html
Orlando Andico wrote:
I think the 'raw partitions' thing is a canard. Oracle9i works on filesystems too, and in fact this is now the recommended default -- I feel *better* at seeing those files on the filesystem (which I can backup with tar) than having everything on this impenetrable partition.Anyway, yes InnoDB lets you commit/rollback -- however it doesn't improve concurrency (multiuser) performance in a high-write regime very much. MySQL was always good for fast queries on a mostly read-only database. On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Hagibis Fan wrote: ..thanks for the link...I think they have something about transactions now though (they have this thing called "innodb" which supposedly supports transaction processing). No idea if they implement referential integrity now. I'm pretty sure they are strictly file-based (as opposed to other databases which can operate on raw partitions) which scares me a bit. I'm just hoping for the future, I'm trying to figure if maybe they'll become big later.
