On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 14:11, Pablo Manalastas wrote: > Quoting Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > As I mentioned on IRC, I recommend that we use Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1 > > with complete security updates for the SittingPenguin, unless IBM or the > > organizers exert pressure to use RedHat. > > Has anyone yet taken a look at trusteddebian-0.9.1? Please see > > http://www.trusteddebian.org/ > > This one is based on debian, and all the known kernel- and compiler- > security patches have already been put in. The 0.9.1 version number > worries me though.
I've check their site, and somehow they tried to duplicate what OpenBSD's doing, albeit with Debian. It's quite impressive that what their implementation of security isn't very intrusive (with RSBAC as opposed to NSA's method). It's essentially a fork of the stable distribution (for the meantime I think), as their work has yet to be integrated into the Debian project proper. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
