--- Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/What_did_SCO_buy.html > > Not the usual mainstream-press dignifying of SCO's > wild claims; but also, > not the usual groklaw/FSF denigrating of SCO's wild > claims.
Nice article, he says that it all depends upon the interpretation, maybe one interpretation that might have a significant impact on the case between IBM and SCO is the interpretation of AT&T, the original owner of UNIX and the one that made the license. right? http://www.vnunet.com/News/1152922 http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040212154324447 from $ echo - AT&T's news letter <quote> Section 2.01 - The last sentence was added to assure licensees that AT&T will claim no ownership in the software that they developed -- only the portion of the software developed by AT&T. </quote> meaning jfs and some other things that IBM contributed to the Linux kernel which the SCO group says they own is really owned by IBM. but ofcourse the last word is always the judge thats handling the case. -Dek > --- > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mosaic Communications, Inc. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
