On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 11:57 +0800, Eric Noel wrote:
> Can anyone share configuration/setup procedures for implementing debian 
> as a pix/firewall replacement for production? or has anybody secured 
> debian to be their production firewall in protecting their financial 
> data centric network (e.g banks, stock traders, etc)? Is it recommended, 
> or we should just use pix/fw1 for that.

I've done that in QC City Hall, but it wasn't really a PIX replacement -
the debian firewall I made there was replaced by PIX of a Cisco 6509 :D

That time I implemented the debian machine as a firewall, there was no
Cisco 6509 there at City Hall :D

If you've got PIX already - use it. If not, then going for a PC firewall
does save some budget. Pros and Cons:

PC Router/Firewall:
Pros: dirt cheap, easy to implement, easy to extend functionality
Cons: moving parts, constant patching

Appliance Router/Firewall:
Pros: Less moving parts, easy to implement, less patching
Cons: TONS MORE EXPENSIVE :D, not easy to extend functionality

The ideas that you translate in PIX are also applicable in configuring
PC routers - it's just that you'd need to translate them into
ipchains/iptables for Linux, or ipfw/pf for the BSDs.

-- 


Paolo Alexis Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie

Reply via email to