No offense taken :) Was just curious on your FC2 experience. What's your LAN card? As for OoO performance, it must be increased memory consumption.
----- Original Message ----- From: Dong Calmada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:59:09 +0800 Subject: [plug] Red Hat 9 better than Fedora Core 2? To: Philippine Linux Users Group Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dear Migs, I'm sorry if I passed that judgment that Red Hat 9 is better than Fedora Core 2. I just had initial troubles with Fedora Core 2 as soon as I installed it. Few of these were that my lan card was not immediately detected and OpenOffice became slower and slower. CrossOver Office was also slow and sometimes presented problems like program crash. KDE hangs when I try to point to an smb location. And I don't have time for tweaking, nowadays. I'm looking forward to Fedora Core 3 when many issues or bugs are fixed already. I'm also trying to look for other distros which can run Windows applications, like Win4Lin. But my problem is I don't have a credit card to buy Win4Lin. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
