On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:26:22AM +0800, Orlando Andico wrote: > > That's weird.. the 386DX does NOT have a math coprocessor. That would > be the 486DX.
Hmmm... I was wrong then. :) It was the 486sx that needed a math coprocessor! I had the wrong information at the time and I never got it correct until now. hehe In retrospect, the floating point math probably did not make a big difference to me. -- ___ _____________________________ eric pareja (xenos AT maharlika.upm.edu.ph) \e/ [ Philippine Linux Users' Group http://plug.linux.org.ph ] [PSHS'85] _v_ [ Linux User #8159 http://counter.li.org ] [Debian] [Python] [ /. #2834 ] #27 [Ubiquitous Computing] [http://www.bookcrossing.com/referral/pusakat] Join us on IRC: #plug irc.free.net.ph:6667 | http://www.upm.edu.ph/~xenos -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
