On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:02:24 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Im trying to implement vpn tunnels via broadband in order to eliminate the > need for leased lines. Based on your experiences, which of the three is the > best to utilize with reliability as the main factor? I'm planning to create > IPSec tunnels with Windows and SOHO routers (say Zyxel P-334) as clients. >
The only standards-compliant VPN solutions out of the two are OpenSWAN and FreeSWAN (as they can implement IPSec, while OpenVPN implements it's own mechanism using SSL certificates). Among those two there's the issue of active maintenance - as FreeSWAN's already a dead project. Your best option would be the only option left standing if you're looking for a standards-compliant VPN solution. However, if you don't mind using a non-standard tunnelling solution then OpenVPN or even tinc would do. -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie