Could you explain the details why/how DNS over Https would you "not recommend using it. It's just a way for data-mining companies to suck up more of your private life"?
The way I understand it, it is meant to provide privacy from your ISP and traffic observation along the way to the DNS. It should not make anything else worse/better. Thanks, Tomas On Sun, Dec 29, 2019, 03:01 Tom <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:14:00 -0800 > "Mike C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Has anyone dug into this much or actually using it? > > > > It's experimental in Chrome but not currently available in the .deb > > version. > > > > Apparently, It has been a Firefox feature for a few years, but Chrome > > has been my browser of choice for many years now. > > > > OpenWrt supports DoH through DNSMasq and HTTPS-DNS-Proxy. Which is > > nice because then all your LAN / WLAN devices can use it after > > setting up once and makes troubleshooting any problems related to it > > much easier. > > > > I know a few years ago, DNSMasq was pretty standard on Ubuntu / Debian > > based distros. Which makes me think there's probably a HTTPS-DNS-Proxy > > package for most Linux distros. > > _______________________________________________ > > PLUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > > I would not recommend using it. It's just a way for data-mining > companies to suck up more of your private life. There's no security or > reliability to it over normal DNS. In fact, the security and > reliability is worse. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
