On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:47:54 -0700, Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 at 15:52 -0700, Lars Rasmussen wrote:
> > > I've been unable to get sox to work with ulaw - I tried sox first.
> > >
> > > 'sox: wave header missing FmtExt chunk'
> >
> > sox produces a .wav file that lame can't use:
> >
> > 'Warning: corrupt or unsupported WAVE format'
>
> The version of sox I have here claims to handle ulaw in wav just fine.
I found if if I pass sox info on the file sox can process it:
sox 15146282.wav -r 8000 -s -w temp.wav
I'm still deciding on best lame compression for my use but this is
what I'm using right now:
lame -V 9 --resample 8 --highpass 0.125 --lowpass 3.4 \
--lowpass-width 0 --noshort temp.wav vbr9.mp3
Lars
.===================================.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`==================================='
