On Mar 23, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
David Smith wrote:<quote who="Kenneth Burgener">I hate to ask the obvious, but is anything actually listening on port 3389[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 3389 Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
on the desination machine? This woulnd't be LDAP would it?
It is for Remote Desktop on a Windows XP Client. The whole reason for this script is we are trying to get remote desktop access to a couple of employees. I haven't quite figured out the next step of how to get multiple machines to be routed to for the same port. This is a little too soon to ask, but do you think this would work:
SERVICES="... tcp:8001:192.168.0.117:3389 tcp:8002:192.168.0.118:3389 tcp:8003:192.168.0.119:3389 tcp:8004:192.168.0.120:3389 tcp:8005:192.168.0.121:3389"??
As Doran pointed out, if you are using these rules, then from an outside box you would do:
telnet your.firewall.ip 8001
to get to 192.168.0.117:3389. Do you see? Doing:
telnet your.firewall.ip 3389
does nothing, because you firewall is listening on port 8001 and forwarding all packets bound for that port to 192.168.0.117:3389. Does that make sense?
Grant
.===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
