It is not immediately obvious what wpa_supplicant has to do with WEP and unprotected networks. That obsoletion notice might explain poor Von's problems with waproamd (I use it all the time at home with no problems and he's lucky to get on 50% of the time without some sweat and cursing)
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 at 10:07 -0600, Roberto Mello wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:11:06PM -0600, Dr G wrote: > > http://support.novell.com/techcenter/articles/tp10007.html > > > > > > http://primates.ximian.com/~rml/netapplet/ > > Some people suggested waproamd on this thread, but I deleted the messages. > In any case, here's what the waproamd web site says, in a very large, red > note: > > "waproamd is obsolete, please use wpa_supplicant instead. waproamd contains > some race conditions that are impossible to fix. wpa_supplicant supersedes > waproamd in almost every way." > > -Roberto > .===================================. > | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > | Don't Fear the Penguin. | > | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > `===================================' > -- .O. Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. ..O http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg OOO | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach --------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95 CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
