On 7/11/05, Josh Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this, IMHO, is THE answer: [flash req'd] http://www.chrisgates.net/irv/ > > lame text version for those non-flash users: > http://www.fairvote.org/irv/a_fairer_way.htm > > anyway, it's instant runoff elections. they make all the sense in the > world, and they prevent the "clinton wins because of bush voters voting for > perot" problem (if you think it was a problem) we had in 1992.
Actually, instant runoff voting (IRV) has some slight issues, but it's on the right track. I mentioned Condorcet (but I think I spelled it wrong). It's supposed to solve some of the issues with IRV. I find it really interesting, see: http://electionmethods.org/index.htm There are lots of other resources about it on the web, also. .===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
