>I refuse to get sucked into the php versus the world debate :-) php? did you even rtfa?
the answer is D from Digital Mars. geesh. c'mon, get with the program and rewriting your code in D. Josh Coates www.jcoates.org -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Dorner Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:19 AM To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List Subject: RE: UT Lisp Users Group? On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:55 -0600, Josh Coates wrote: > hey there mr. straw man guy, he merely cited the paper as an example - > not proof. and it *is* self evident that *some* language enable > greater productivity than others for *some* projects, and anyone who > disagrees with this is either naive or a fool. i trust i don't need > to cite contrived and obvious examples, but let me know if you need any. > Sorry, I must have taken his wording more seriously then he intended. > >No such thing as the perfect or best language. > > wrong. everyone knows that it has already been decided and proven > which language is best. it says right here in this here graph: > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/great/benchmark.php?test=sumcol<=all > &s > ort=fullcpu > I refuse to get sucked into the php versus the world debate :-) brad .===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `===================================' .===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
