On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:29:19AM -0600, Doran Barton wrote: > > Yum is superior to apt4rpm in just about every way now. There's really no > good reason to continue using apt4rpm. >
"just about every way" means every way except that it's about a thousand times slower? What does yum do so differently that makes it so much slower than apt4rpm, especially apt-get update? The playboy thing is old news: http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/05/27/1340243&tid=132&tid=92 .===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
