[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you mention some of the reasons you like Catalyst more than Rails?
-Dennis
I just don't like Rails because everyone is hyping it as a "the next and
best new thing", whereas MVC-based framework models have been around for
awhile. To tell you the truth I haven't tried it yet so I can't give an
unbiased opinion at the moment. I would be interested in seeing a
comparison however. I like Catalyst because a) it's Perl, b) it's
self-sufficient (has it's own server for testing and development), c)
its configuration is in Perl, d) it accepts regex's as url listeners, e)
I like the maintainer's name, and f) it's Perl. There's a good article
by Jesse Sheidlower, the maintainer/pump king of Catalyst explaining how
to get an AJAX-based WIKI up in 30 lines of code that to me explains it
all:
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2005/06/02/catalyst.html
Jesse
.-----------------------------------.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`-----------------------------------'
IMHO Struts is really the best way to go, you have a WAY more active,
enthusiastic, as well as experienced community to draw upon.
.-----------------------------------.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`-----------------------------------'
