On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Andy Bradford wrote:
It seemed a logical conclusion that since you thought ASCII art should go away and since you didn't indicate that the footer should also be removed, that you were suggesting instead that the footer should be replaced with something non-ASCII.
I think the point of miscommunication is that "non-ASCII-art" does not mean "non-ASCII". ASCII art depends on monospaced fonts; something that is merely ASCII does not (like the new footer, to which I whole-heartedly pledge my support).
~ Ross -- PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
