On 09/16/2005 10:56 AM, Al Byers wrote:
Three years ago I stuck RedHat 9 on my laptop and never worried about
it. I really hoped that I could treat it as an appliance since all I
want to do is run eclipse and a j2ee server. It worked well, but then it
got corrupted and since I was using suse 9.3 somewhere else, I threw
that on. It did not recognize my built-in wireless and I could not get
it to fill the screen. I had a Ubuntu set laying around (they send 10 -
anyone want one?) and I installed it. It found my wireless and filled
the screen which I thought was a nice thing. Is that a strength of
Ubuntu or could I count on it from Debian or Gentoo? Looks like I might
have to learn more about Linux than I care to. Have things changed much
since Xenix? :0)

I haven't used wireless with Debian, so I can't say much on that, but it's detected my various peripherals very well. In fact, not too long ago I decided to give the RH world a try again and downloaded CentOS 4.0 (based on RHEL 4). I tried to install it on a machine with a SCSI Card/HD that Debian recognized easily, but CentOS didn't have the modules built into the installer kernel and wouldn't let me install unless I stuck in an IDE drive. Plus, once I got everything installed, I discovered that I can't build my own kernel RPM's to include the necessary driver - I have to install the kernel the standard way. Debian, on the other hand, has a strong set of tools to build kernel packages and manage them just like the official ones. I (again) lost interest in the RH world after that. Debian just makes some basic things easier to do than RH does.

For everyday use, I doubt people would see much of a difference. When it comes to getting down and dirty with system setup I've been very happy with Debian. Ubuntu, being based on the Debian, should share that ease of management. Gentoo, from what I've heard (I've never run it but have had good friends who did), also shares a certain ease of package management, if you consider as package management scripts that download the source from its original location (such as apache.org), patch it, and compile it on your system. Yes, it takes a while to compile everything. I once had a roommate who used Gentoo - he started compiling stuff just about every night before he went to bed.

The basic benefits of Gentoo, from what I've heard, are:
1.  Everything is optimized for your system.
2. Library versioning problems are not generally an issue, since everything is compiled with the libraries on your computer. 3. Because everything is compiled from source, program authors don't have to worry about compiling packages for Gentoo. 4. If the latest ebuild (package script) for a package is not available, you can often change it to work with the latest version very easily, though I don't know how that works with gentoo patches to the program.

I don't have much need for most of Gentoo's benefits and will probably stick with Debian for the near future.

--Tyler
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

Reply via email to