On 12/02/2005 02:07 PM, Tyler Strickland wrote:
On 12/02/2005 01:57 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
If you consider as I do, that the first drive failure is a given,
then the odds of failure is magnitudes larger--back up to the same order
of magnitude as a single drive failing.
On another side note, if you take the first drive failure as a given,
RAID 5 degraded = RAID 0, and we know how much we like RAID 0 in
servers... :)
--Tyler
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
