Steve wrote:
Thats Ok, the Spam companies will happily poney up the cash probably
on stolen credit cards.
AOL customers will get disgusted with the amount of spam they recieve
and hopefully wisen up enough to someone who doesn't do this.
Also if enough people are AOL email users, and they cannot get
important emails because AOL wants to charge the sender, there will be
an uproar.
Honestly I don't see HOW Aol even has a customer base anymore.
Yeah, I agree. We send lots of email (not spam), and if AOL started this, We'd simply tell our customers that they can't get email from us at an AOL address. Stick it in the FAQ, Stick AOL in the trash.
On 2/3/06, Dan Stovall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Becuase it looks like the plug list won't be reaching you as I doubt
they are going to pay.

http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3581301

I know that spam is a problem, and they are only charging a fraction
of a cent per AOL email address, but this is a disturbing trend.
Between this and the recent comments by AT&T's CEO about charging
Google and Yahoo to let AT&T cutomers reach their websites, I don't
like the look of the future of the internet.  It seems like these
companies are looking for any possible way that they can extort money
from every last possible resource.

Dan

--
I swear Power Point is going to be the downfall of higher education in
western society.

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/


/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/


/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

Reply via email to