On 3/11/06, Levi Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidentally, Lisp has had native-code compilers since 1962, and > incremental ones at that, which let you intermix interpreted and > compiled code. Some implementations of Common Lisp today provide no > interpreter at all, and simply compile every expression you give it > before executing it. Having been used for so many years on hardware > far less powerful than today's, it has very mature and sophisticated > optimizing compilers. So, for dynamic applications that require a > lot of indirection and reflection, Lisp provides excellent > performance and unparalleled flexibility.
Sounds great. So when do we get to see the solution to Sasha's dictionary problem implemented in Lisp? I'm dying to see the result. -Bryan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
