Since when did list netiquette involve personally attacking someone who didn't obey some rather arbitrary mailing list advice?
A simple "most people would prefer if you trimmed your message" would've sufficed, IMO. Either that, or buy one of those fandangled scroll-mice and quit caring how people prefer to reply. But don't even get me started on those top-posting morons!! :) Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jason Hall > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:37 AM > To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List > Subject: Re: SSH hank attempts bad? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Carey wrote: > > Let me apologise again for not snipping my response enough. It must > > have caused your scrolling finger some pain to motivate you to make a > > personal attack on me. > > > > Nah, doesn't take much at all, especially when it comes to list > netiquette. > > - -- > Jayce^ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFEPTquA10/0O8cAHgRAgWkAJ9e10WNrHAvigHZIq5/RjDGVDNiwgCfZ+IR > SzBLLx8qc/OmbnbGFPUimb8= > =n4Ne > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
