On Thursday 31 August 2006 4:35 pm, Daniel C. wrote: > On 8/31/06, Dr. Scott S. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chiropractic is a threat to the AMA and medical establishment, because > > it's something beyond their control and thus ability to profit from it. > > Number Two on the Signs of Bogus Science list: "The discoverer says > that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work." > Replace discoverer with practitioner and this sounds an awful lot like > what you're saying, Dr. Jones. > > How ethical or unethical the AMA may be is not the matter at heart > here; whether chiropractic does what it claims to is. Within certain > areas, chiropractic care does have benefits. Unfortunately, few > chiropractors see fit to limit themselves to these areas, if they even > know what they are.
Wow... who peed in your cheerios? But seriously, tell us how you really feel about chiropractors. ...Meanwhile; my back feels great. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
