We run both Exchange and Zimbra on Windows 2003 Server and Suse Enterprise respectively.
The Exchange box runs more reliably (behind a ISA 2004 firewall) than Zimbra, but Zimbra is very easy to use and manage (provided the client has a fast processor). -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Morris Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:24 PM To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List Subject: Question regarding experience We've had some discussion recently about server replacements for Exchange. I did get all of the suggestions for such applications, such as Zimbra, Citadel, OpenXchange, Scalix, etc. What I didn't catch was personal experience that anyone had with any of these. If you've had experience with any of these, which seems easiest to install, maintain, etc? Off-hand, do you know which support Outlook connectivity without having to buy something extra? Anything to steer clear of or be aware of? Again, I'm aware of many of the possible alternatives. I'm mostly just looking for personal experience that anyone has had. My manager is about 10 seconds away from just telling me to install Exchange. Please save me from the agony. :) Thanks in advance. Scott Morris /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006 /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
