On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 10:34 -0600, Doran Barton wrote: > Our client that uses bacula was using NetVault for Linux for a while and > bacula ROCKS, big time, compared to NetVault.
We moved from NetVault to Bacula and I would recommend it. NetVault has a lot of quirks and for the price didn't seem to work all that well. More and more we've been moving to online disk backups. Tape is slow and expensive. The one advantage of tape is that you can take it off site for long term storage. That may be of interest for you. For us, not so much. With Bacula you can create virtual tape drives on disk and still take advantage of the scheduling and such. I've got a handful of servers doing that as well. In other cases we're using rsync. And in yet others we rely on application level mirroring. Just depends on what your recovery needs are. Corey
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
