On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:18:47 -0800, Bryan Sant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:-( good point. Using annonymous inner-classes works just like a
delegate, but it's more crufty code, and would throw people off when
porting their code from C# to Java. I believe that delegates and
closures are being added to Java 7. Maybe this project would have to
be developed in concert with that release of Java.
I get the general idea of delegates, but not the specifics. Would somebody
mind showing some identical-ish C# and Java code, one using delegates and
the other using anonymous inner classes?
Also, while we're on the topic of C# and Java, what makes C# generics
"real generics", and Java's generics not really real? Is it because Java's
generics are backwards-compatible with non-genericized code, and therefore
non-generic-compliant code only generates warnings rather than compile
errors?
~ Ross
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
