On 11/27/06, Andrew McNabb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:04:55PM -0700, Sterling Jacobson wrote: > > If you want options on iProvo, then you all need to fight with us for > it. We would gladly become a provider and are waiting for the city to > change their (possibly illegal) ways. How would you recommend doing that? I've tried emailing the city/mayor before, but I never got any response. Is there a good way to share your opinions with them?
I've spoken to the folks in charge of iProvo many times about this, but I don't think they understand the problem. I get the feeling that they just don't comprehend the gap between the service offered by Nuvont/Mstar and that of a proper ISP. I wish I could have them /join #xmlounge and watch for a while to try to get a taste, but I'm sure they would say, "what's IRC?". So, instead we're left with this: http://nuvont.net/ Click on the "IPROVO" link. In case they actually fix it before you read this, that link has been a 404 for a few weeks now. However, Nuvont doesn't have bandwidth caps, so some might prefer them even if Xmission were on iProvo. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
