On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 at 09:19 -0700, Levi Pearson wrote: > "Bryan Petty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem isn't with reading the mail, it's with replying. It has > > the tendency to result in some clients breaking up lines into 10 > > word and 2 word line pairs when quoting already quoted emails, and > > makes visually reading quoted emails near impossible to tell what's > > quoted once, and what's quoted twice making it hard to tell who said > > what. > > If you used emacs gnus for mail reading, you could do a quote- > preserving reformat of your correspondent's message with a single > keystroke! It's too bad lesser email programs don't have that > feature.
vim too (e.g. if you're using mutt). Although I think it might be 2 keystrokes if you don't have a mapping like I do. -- Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. -- Johann Sebastian Bach
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
