Corey Edwards wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:52 -0600, Topher Fischer wrote: > >> Also, in my mind, the solution to this problem seems too easy. I must >> be missing something. Why do machines even pay attention to ARP replies >> that they did not solicit? Why isn't ARP just implemented so that when >> a request is sent out, then any matching replies are processed and >> nothing more? What am I missing here? >> > > I "researched" this one time too. What I found was that Linux and Cisco > devices were not vulnerable to ARP spoofing because they did just as you > outline. I looked through some of the ARP code in Linux and that > appeared to indeed be the case, although I can't say I know that for > sure. Windows was easily spoofed however. > > Corey > It works against my laptop, which is running 2.6.19 right now.
-- Topher Fischer GnuPG Fingerprint: 3597 1B8D C7A5 C5AF 2E19 EFF5 2FC3 BE99 D123 6674 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
